William Skidelsky reviews David Papineau’s new book, in which sport meets philosophy.
David Papineau is an eminent philosopher and a passionate lover of sport. For much of his life, he has kept the two spheres separate, fearing that to mix them would produce a double negative in his readers’ appreciation of his work: philosophy robbed of its seriousness and sport of its excitement. Then, in 2012, a colleague invited him to contribute to a lecture series titled ‘Philosophy and Sport’, organised to coincide with that year’s Olympics. ‘I couldn’t really refuse’, Papineau recalls. ‘I had an extensive knowledge of both philosophy and sport. If I wasn’t going to say yes, who would?’
The reviewer suggests that Papineau
A was in two minds whether to take on the lectures on sport and philosophy.
B thought no one was better qualified than him to combine sport and philosophy.
C was disappointed with previous attempts to unite sport and philosophy.
D thought that philosophy was of greater value to people’s lives than sport.
c
h
e
c
k
y
o
u
r
a
n
s
w
e
r
The correct answer is letter B.